Friction
Where does the current process make good decisions harder than they need to be?
I use this when a rewards decision sounds polished but does not quite hold up. It is a simple way to pressure-test fairness without pretending every answer lives in a spreadsheet.
Where does the current process make good decisions harder than they need to be?
Do the philosophy, the process, and the outcome actually line up, or are they just politely acquainted?
What changed for employees, managers, or the business because this choice was made?
Can the decision survive both a people meeting and a finance meeting without getting evasive?